Member-only story

The Use and Abuse of Executive Direct Action Studies in Government and Public Policy

Darren Blair

·7.7k Followers· Follow

Published in By Order Of The President: The Use And Abuse Of Executive Direct Action (Studies In Government And Public Policy)

4 min read

154 View Claps

28 Respond

Save

Listen

By Order of the President: The Use and Abuse of Executive Direct Action (Studies in Government and Public Policy)

by Noel Sanford

4.3 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	13725 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	550 pages
Screen Reader	:	Supported

Executive direct action studies (EDAs) are a type of research that can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of government programs. EDAs are typically conducted by government agencies or contractors, and they involve the collection of data from a sample of program participants. The data is then used to estimate the program's impact on a variety of outcomes.

EDAs can be a valuable tool for assessing the effectiveness of government programs. However, EDAs can also be abused, and this can lead to misleading or even harmful results. One of the most common abuses of EDAs is the use of biased samples. For example, an EDA that is conducted on a sample of program participants who are already likely to benefit from the program is likely to overestimate the program's effectiveness.

Another common abuse of EDAs is the use of flawed research designs. For example, an EDA that does not account for the possibility of selection bias is likely to produce biased results. Selection bias occurs when the participants in an EDA are not representative of the population that the program is intended to serve. This can lead to the EDA overestimating or underestimating the program's effectiveness.

The abuse of EDAs can have serious consequences. For example, an EDA that overestimates the effectiveness of a government program could lead to the program being expanded or continued even though it is not actually effective. This could waste taxpayer money and resources, and it could also lead to people being harmed by the program.

There are a number of things that can be done to avoid the pitfalls of EDA research. First, it is important to ensure that the sample of program participants is representative of the population that the program is intended to serve. Second, it is important to use a sound research design that accounts for the possibility of selection bias. Third, it is important to be transparent about the limitations of the EDA and to avoid making claims that are not supported by the data.

By following these guidelines, researchers can help to ensure that EDAs are used to provide accurate and unbiased information about the effectiveness of government programs.

EDAs can be a valuable tool for assessing the effectiveness of government programs. However, EDAs can also be abused, and this can lead to misleading or even harmful results. By following the guidelines outlined in this article, researchers can help to ensure that EDAs are used to provide accurate and unbiased information about the effectiveness of government programs.

By Order of the President: The Use and Abuse of Executive Direct Action (Studies in Government and Public Policy)

by Noel Sanford

4.3 out of 5